kyrios In 2 years time things can change and you may have a different point of view, so you may feel like writing a different review. This is even healthy.
Two years ago, Solus Budgie was installed on two of my computers, a Dell Optiplex Micro 7050 desktop (1920 x 1080 24" display at 100% scaling) and a Dell Latitude 7280 laptop (1366 x 766 12.5" display at 100% scaling). At the time, I would have reported that Solus Budgie worked fine on a laptop, albeit with reduced battery life.
Since then, I've given the 7280 to a grandson, replaced the 7280 with a Dell Latitude 7390 (1920 x 1080 13.5" display at 150% scaling in Windows 11). I installed Solus on that computer with the intention to use it at the railroad, as I had used the 7280, but had to give up the attempt because I could not work out a satisfactory way to handle scaling in Linux at 1920 x 1080 on a 13.5" laptop display. I could get about 80% of the way there by changing taskbar and font scaling, but Solus just did not work as well as I needed in order to use it at the railroad. So that laptop is running Windows 11 at 150% scaling, and I have no intention of changing unless and until Solus (and Linux in general) works out scaling so that it works as well as it does in Windows. Wayland claims to be the solution, but I don't use it so I don't know.
If I wrote a Solus review today, it seems to me that I would have to mention that Solus might not work acceptably on a modern laptop scaled at 125% or 150%, and explain why. That's a change.
kyrios What is fake imo is asking the community to write reviews to artificially boost the scores.
I agree. Ditto for flooding Distrowatch with page hits.
