[deleted]
Scotty-Trees i have tried endeavourOS on a vm, and discovered that it doesnt have a graphical package manager! this was tough for a novice user like me. So i feel endeavour is mostly restricted to command line Enthusiasts.
Scotty-Trees i have tried endeavourOS on a vm, and discovered that it doesnt have a graphical package manager! this was tough for a novice user like me. So i feel endeavour is mostly restricted to command line Enthusiasts.
Lucien_Lachance No, it's just an "Arch with an installer" kind of deal. Everything else is Arch upstream.
[deleted] Well it's a bad idea in general to use anything Arch-based if one's terrified of the command line.
[deleted] I think there are some good arch based distros out there to ease people into "btw, I use arch". Garuda is arch based, and Arco Linux offers multiple iso'd depending on how much archiness you want. Also it's set up to teach you from basic install and run all the way up to build your own arch iso, which is nice.
[deleted] I would give the EndeavourOS VM another try honestly. I used EndeavourOS in Gnome Boxes for a couple weeks to become familiar and comfortable with it. And while yes EndeavourOS is ideally meant to use the terminal, you can use it however you like also and just so you know there is a GUI program called Pamac
that you can install that is essentially like the Software Center in Solus. Pamac
is GUI for pacman to install/remove/search packages. I have it installed as well and use it from time to time for simple installs and updates. But for most things I try to use the terminal, and I'm by no means an expert, (I'm simply learning little by little) I just use about maybe a dozen terminal commands and that's it. If you give the VM another go, to install Pamac
is simple:
yay -S pamac-aur
yay is an AUR helper (still actively maintained btw) written in GO that helps you install packages from the AUR, -S is the command to install a package and pamac-aur
is the package to install. There are a few other packages, like pamac-aur-git
andpamac-all-git
, but for most users I'd say go with pamac-aur
Now to get Pamac working as intended in an Arch-based distro like EndeavourOS (it was created by the Manjaro Devs btw), you do have to install one other package the EndeavourOS team maintains so the main screen in Pamac
shows the app list correctly. Just install the package called archlinux-appstream-data-pamac:
yay -S archlinux-appstream-data-pamac
The above command may ask you to remove a file that is similar to this one. That is okay and you want to remove it. So once you do those two simple commands, you have yourself a working GUI software center like application that allows you to install, remove, search, and update your system. Just know that even though EndeavourOS is ideally terminal based, many (I would argue most) have Pamac installed on their systems as their preferred method. Hope that helps and good luck in the VMs!
[deleted] Well it's a bad idea in general to use anything Arch-based if one's terrified of the command line.
i am sure i wont have any problem in SteamOS 3
yeah sure i will try the vm again, thanks for the information!
[deleted] I'm definitely curious to see how SteamOS 3 turns out.
Hola, si tuviera que cambiar SolusOS lo har铆a por KDE ne贸n o ZorinOS, pero en realidad estoy muy contento con SolusOS Budgie y no tengo la menor intenci贸n de hacerlo ya que es una distribuci贸n excelente!
Umm... whatever gets forked from it.. I don't want another lol. Love Solus, hope it stays around forever. There is no other distro quite like it and I don't want to have to switch.
I mostly used Arch based distros ( Manjaro, Endeavour os) , tried to use Elementay os , Zorin os ( but had issues). I am satisfied with Solus for now, I hope it will stay like this
Garuda with XFCE or Gnome
ill be giving the new manjaro release a spin on a secondary drive. seems its got btrfs and snapshots now which imo definitely is the way to go. wish it was available on solus as well, then again solus is probably the rolling distro that needs a safety net like that the least
Anything Debian-based. Probably POP_OS or Linux Mint.
I tried over 20 different distros. I'm mostly into Debian/Ubuntu based ones. My favourites are:
I tried Solus few years ago when it was quite new and I liked some ideas, but could't get my stuff working. So I used Mint for years, then Sparkylinux, because I could get most FPS in games on my lousy hardware. I was curious about other and independent distros and Solus isn't some obscure and barebone one that needs serious tweaks. I tried it and I was suprised how good it looks and how well Mate edition works on a potato PC. Also it works great with Wine, Steam, Snap and Flatpak. Linux Lite had problems with running Windoze stuff for some reason, even when it's very close to Ubuntu. My Linux distro has to look nice, be fairly lightweight and must run Windoze/Steam games without much hassle. Even if I use Linux since 2010 I still prefer stuff that works out of the box and is somehow familiar. I'm really suprised how familiar Solus is even if it's not Debian/Ubuntu and eopkg was quite easy for me to get into after years with apt.
Lucien_Lachance Doesn't Solus have a built in rollback feature? I believe stateless is the term
Fedora rawhide
OpenSuse Tumbleweed
Solus
EndeavorOS
ArcoLinux
Either ArcoLinux or Manjaro for me if I hadn't found Solus. Still find more stability with Solus thought.
I replied to this two years ago. And I thought about it a long time since this thread keeps bouncing around. My answer is still the same as in 2019: Win 7.
(I tried a lot of ugly distros because I needed a foss life, but solus was the easiest on the eyes. an aesthetic marvel. If that's shallow, then I am shallow).