why Solus not others ?

3mmar If you want high customization then I suggest you to use Solus Plasma.
Here you have the info about it.

I personally use Budgie.

Debian/Ubuntu based distros are no longer an option for me. I use it for Servers, yes but not at home. It is just annoying for a Desktop PC also used for gaming.
I need rolling release... but the "arch way" comes with work you have to do to maintain your system, none is doing it for you, you have to do it yourself. Especially when using lots of stuff from the AUR. Which you will need to, otherwise you miss out on software more than you would on other distros not using "arch/AUR". AUR is good but also a risky place to install software from and you have to research, read, look for everything to not have trouble on the next bigger updates.

If I am not mistaken, the Solus devs have a kinda similar stand on the AUR thing. Of course there is Manjaro, and I also used it a lot over the years. But I think there is no benefit for using it instead of just using ArchLinux if you really want to have a bleeding edge rolling release Distro. Actually, Manjaro broke after updates more often than any ArchLinux install I have used before.

So, at home, I do not want to mess around with this stuff when I have to do this a lot outside of home on servers. At home I want a stable good running desktop distro which is curated by competent people. The Solus team does a very very good job on that. Weekly updates, (with big updates taking 2 weeks, which is more than ok and understandable as it is a BIG update.). I like the stand of the Solus team on simple things which I pretty much agree on almost all of them. At least of that what I've read over the last months and years.

And I really like Budgie, and who makes and made Budgie? Right.
And I think there needs to be some contrast to Debian/Ubuntu, Fedora and Arch based distros etc. So I like to "support" it.

Which distro would I use when Solus is no more tomorrow? I don't know actually, maybe I would go back to ArchLinux and live with the negative aspects of it. Maybe I would test Tumbleweed more out.

See Scotty-Trees words. I use Gnome from day one. Perfect.

Greetings, Evert.

Gotta agree with Scotty as well.

1) Solus is rolling yet stable
2) Budgie is gorgeous, sure it may not have the customization of plasma (which you can use on solus if you want) but it still facilitates everything I need
3) Developers actually have a clear vision for what they want and stick to it which I feel a lot of distros could learn from. If you want a desktop, use a distro made for desktop (i.e. solus) if you want a server then you should use a distro made for servers (i.e. centOS or a BSD derivative). There is no reason for one distro to try and be everything.

I wound up going to solus because it was the only distro that actually worked and didn't break itself on a regular basis. I started on linux mint which worked well until it decided to break some internal config file making me have a lovely full screen splash of errors whenever I booted. Then I went to Manjaro which lasted for about 2 days because nothing worked with each other. Some things needed an AUR package which would then complain about a standard repo package, etc. The whole thing was a mess. Then I tried Fedora, which worked alright outside of demanding restarts after every single update. It felt like I needed to restart my computer after turning it on everyday. Then I tried to use opensuse tumbleweed which I couldn't even get all my software I need set up (look up rstudio dependency issues with tumbleweed) and their forum was extremely toxic regarding help. Then I went to Ubuntu Budgie because I liked how budgie looked but it again had issues and I didn't like how aggressively Canonical was pushing snaps especially in clean installs.

Which then led me to Solus. I was initially worried about it having all my packages (due to old out of date reviews) but not only did it actually have everything I need (bar one single package which has a flatpak) but the setup process was the easiest of any of the distros and I have yet to have anything break even slightly.

My biggest negative about solus is simply that I cant donate to support the developers themselves (but that has been discussed to death on these forums)

I run Solus on my desktop and Manjaro on my laptop, i like the contrast.

Scotty has it nailed.

3mmar
All of the environments on Linux are customizable, it's just that some are more customizable than others.

It's just that when it comes to customization, KDE is king. It's just overflowing with options.

GNOME takes the second place, and Budgie the last (no idea how MATE compares tho).

If customization is really important to you, you should definitely try KDE. However, if it's not the most important feature for you, just choose whichever environment seems the most cool by default for you, and go from there.

If you'll stick with Linux, you'll probably end up trying various environments anyway. So just pick any, and begin exploring.
There's no telling which one you'll end up preferring the best, as everyone's taste is different. What works for someone, might not work for someone else.

For example, I'm a GNOME lover, but it seems to garner a lot of hate online. It goes to say, that everyone should pick whatever suits them the best.

Junglist MATE is extremely customizable. Just take a look at some of the themes available in Ubuntu MATE. It has settings to make it look like Windows, MATE 2, Unity, MacOS... I wish other MATE releases had that built-in.

I'd had issues with MATE though. I seem to break things a lot more frequently in MATE than other DEs. I want to like it because it's so flexible, but only Ubuntu MATE has all of the themes available from the start. Mint's release seems very stable, but doesn't have all of the features available like Ubuntu.

What I would say is that I chose Solus because it was easy. A lot of other distros out there require a bit more finagling around to get things working just right. I had this problem a little bit with Manjaro (the first distro I used for any significant length of time), and it's a big part of why I left Manjaro and went to Solus. Now as far as the other easy distros out there, distros like Linux Mint, or Ubuntu Mate, most of them are not rolling release. Meaning their software may or may not be as up to date as Solus. They may have more options to choose from in terms of applications you want to use, but many of them will be redundant, and as I just said they may or may not be as up to date as what you get with Solus. The main advantage of Solus over it's competitors is that it offers a small stable and up to date repository of software, while other distros either tend to offer large up to date unstable repositories, or large not up to date stable ones. Solus strikes the balance giving just the amount of software you need whilst maintaining stability and frequency of updates.

As for what Desktop environment? The one with the most customization options is KDE Plasma. However, if you are new to Linux I would give you a word of caution about Plasma. The Plasma iso still isn't an official version of Solus yet. It's currently still considered testing. Further KDE (in my experience) tends to have more releases that can be a bit wonky than the gtk based environments. If you go with KDE you may, on rare occasions, be faced with an odd bug or two that you have to deal with. I don't mean to dissuade you. I use KDE Plasma on my main pc right now, and I love it. It's great. It's just that occasionally it will give me a problem I have to deal with. For example, for the past little while Kmail (the default mail client if you use KDE) hasn't wanted to work properly with my Gmail. There was once a long time ago that a KDE update got pushed that somehow managed to bork half the KDE applications on my computer. These things happen rarely, not enough that it's bothered me, but your mileage may vary. I'd say KDE is overall a more complete, but a slightly less smooth experience than some of the other desktop environment options.

Both the Budgie, and Mate environments are relatively easy to customize (using Gnome Tweaks, and Mate Tweaks software respectively), and will give you a bit of a smoother simpler experience. So if that's what you're looking for then I'd try one or both of them out. I personally run a distro called Debian using Mate on my laptop so I can vouch that Mate is very very good. I also used to use Budgie a long time ago, back when I first started using Solus. It was really good then already, and from what I've heard it's only improved since. Both of these are easily customizable and easy to use. They may not have the sheer girth of options KDE offers, but they get the job done.

The Final option would be GNOME I don't know that I would recommend this to new Linux users or not not. It can be a bit finicky to customize, and it's a completely different desktop paradigm from any other environment I know of. It is very unlike windows, and I'm not even sure it's that similar to Mac. Only use GNOME if you're looking for something completely different then you're likely used to. I used GNOME for a few months before switching to KDE early this past year. It was enjoyable, interesting, and elegant. However there was a slight learning curve due to it's different paradigm of use. I had a few issues with it being a little slugglish, but I've heard that these have recently been resolved. Gnome is good, but strange, worth trying out, but very different from the others. Also it's probably the least customizable .

Honestly I would advise downloading all 4 versions of Solus, and then trying each of them out in turn. You can do this by just running them off a usb stick. You have to do this before you install anyways. when you plug the usb stick with the solus iso on it into a usb port and select it to boot from when you turn on your computer you will be taken to a live environment where you can try it out before you choose to install. It will likely be running a little more sluggishly like this then it would once you install it, but it would be good enough to get the feel for which environment you'd feel most comfortable with. Also keep in mind that people on these forums (as far as I can tell) tend to be eager to help each other out so if you run into any roadblocks when installing or afterwards never be afraid to post here, or even over on the reddit page for help

A lot of great replies here but OP never said their level of experience (linux) or comfort level or background.
I think I should make all my questions this poetic. There is an uncompromising beauty in the simple question but it's probably google translate.
My response: I chose what I call the "scrappy independent" for one reason, no, two reasons: easy on the eyes and functional.
No distro ('flavour') I tried had both. Plus the independent part was the sell.
I don't think I've explored 1/10 of Budgie's customizability, if that is a word.
See Max_The_Bear : mate workmanline and a nice bridge. When official I can see KDE in my future. Gnome an acquired taste (why is desktop always yelling at me?)
All this stuff you can tweak to your heart's content without forcing your way into an admin position (I think). If you get in a jam you will be helped fast at the forum.

I use Solus because you all force me to. I'd much rather be using EvolveOS.

imeanwat

JoshStrobl Poor Josh, we know he's so pliable.