Sync Updates for Week 39, 2024

WetGeek

Although the updates were applied smoothly, I didn't realize that the problem with losing the network after a hibernation still persists. So, the hibernate funtion is meaningless. I can shut a computer down at night, and accompllish the same thing - either way, I have to restart everything in the morning.

I know my memory isn't perfect, but I could swear I solved this problem a little while ago. Seems like it's back.

jacojacker

I have come with many issues, but most of them were solved.

I have this remaining problem :

sep 29 14:10:25 systemd-logind[1010]: Failed to connect to system bus: No such file or directory
sep 29 14:10:25 systemd-logind[1010]: Failed to fully start up daemon: No such file or directory
sep 29 14:10:25 systemd[1]: Failed to start systemd-logind.service - User Login Management.

Also

root@solus / # clr-boot-manager update
No kernels detected on system to update

Staudey

jacojacker What is the last thing you configured on this system? Did you change desktop environment? Install something weird from outside the repository?

Kiwimoose

Staudey thanks staudey! Rerunning usysconf was enough to get it to work 🙂

jacojacker

Staudey Yes, installed Ollama and being on ADM GPU started installing RoCM.

Not sure if that was the case.

Although I have managed to get it working the old "windows" way. Reinstalled, updated, and everything went back to normal. (I had my /home on another disk) Thanks!

Staudey

jacojacker Yes, installed Ollama

Ah well, that'll do it. There was someone on Matrix who also had issues with the ollama installer (or maybe that was you?)

brent

MARIADB UPDATE QUESTION

while updating budgie laptop it got to installingmariadb-common and eopkg presented me with a prompt: "Re-install same version of package? (yes/no)"

I hit YES and updated finished successfully.
QUESTION: Nothing to see here?
thank you!

Staudey

brent Huh, I've never seen that prompt before

WetGeek

brent

I got the same message during my update for Plasma. I anwered, "yes" as well and no harm seemed to result. I no longer remember which package it was in reference to on my system, but I distinctly remember that message.

jacojacker

Staudey Not me, but probably same problem. Further on I'll make sure of reading the manual prior to any installation that could hinder my system.

That , or having a good backup!

brent

Staudey no one has seen the weird solus stuff I've seen...born under a bad sign perhaps..

kizilyildiz

Hello,

Is it possible to update Virtualbox to 7.1.2? There are lots of bug fixes.

Murat

TraceyC

kizilyildiz Is it possible to update Virtualbox to 7.1.2? There are lots of bug fixes.

Anyone wanting a package to be updated should file a package update request. Thanks.

brent

WetGeek thank you for confirming this. like you, I have to assume this meant nothing.

Harvey

cherry-picked discord 0.0.70

Harvey

cherry-picked:

firefox 131.0
vivaldi-stable 6.9.3447.51

snowee

Harvey i just synced this cherry pick and saw that my bash got updated to 5.2.32, release 83.

Is the bash update correct?
I'm asking because bash was not specified in your list of cherry-picks.

Thank you.

brent

Harvey got the updates for FF and Bash and rebooted. thanks!

Harvey

snowee

If updates are available they are always correct, just because something is not listed as being cherry-picked does not mean it is a mistake. I did not mention it because I did not cherry-pick it, someone else on the team did it well before my cherry-picks. The bash update fixes an issue that is only relevant when we create a new ISO so they probably didn't feel it warranted mentioning it here.

MikeK61

All went fine for me on Plasma and im getting used to discover. I like it, dont care much about the size of the updates.

WetGeek

brent got the updates for FF and Bash and rebooted

Did you check the version numbers after your "updates"? In order to get the update for Vivaldi, I needed to use --reinstall when I updated. Else, I just got a message telling me that it was already installed, and wouldn't be installed again. Apparently not all of the numbers in the version are significant to eopkg.

brent

WetGeek i did read harvey's FF hyperlink before I installed but did not note the FF version number when I did install. There was no incident with the cherry-picked packages.
We both recently got "Re-install same version of package? (yes/no)" and you just got "it was already installed, and wouldn't be installed again" so a little redundancy/overlap with all the moving parts lately is my theory(?).

edit:

WetGeek I needed to use --reinstall when I updated. Else, I just got a message telling me that it was already installed
not the expected behavior for sure

nolan

Harvey I had the same question, that answer it.
Side note: I think it could be, for transparency with the user, better to mention any cherry-pic, in the (hopefully not) possible supply-chain attack scenario would be a bit more obvious to pinpoint. I could be overthinking this though.

« Previous Page Next Page »